About      Articles      Links     Email     Blog      New     
I Am For Sure Copyright© IAmForSure.com 2003-2017 AD All rights reserved

I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!John 8:58"

Bookmark and Share  

 

Speaking in Tongues

By Bruce W. Robida

Updated 07/08/2012

 

This controversial subject is really much easier to clear up than one might think. For the Scriptures to be understood properly they must not only be read in their proper context, but they must also be taken at face value. Rendering their plain meaning rather than looking for some hidden truth will go a long way toward understanding the least of the spiritual gifts, speaking in tongues.

There are many reasons for the controversies surrounding this gift. More often than not, the gift of speaking in tongues is practiced improperly in many churches today. Some people will even go so far as to say that the primary evidence that a person has received the gift of the Holy Spirit is speaking in tongues. We know that the Holy Spirit bestows gifts to all believers in Jesus Christ, but the Scriptures say that not all believers will receive the same gifts (1 Corinthians 12:30). The Holy Spirit bestows gifts as He determines.

One problem in many churches today is that what is often passed off as speaking in tongues is really nothing more than unintelligible babble. The act of speaking in tongues was first displayed on the day of Pentecost and was actually foreign languages that were spoken by the apostles. These foreign languages were actual languages that were in existence at that time. On that day, there was no need for an interpreter because as you will see, this miraculous gift was given so that every person could hear the message of the gospel in their own language.

Compare the NIV to the KJV

When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place. Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting. They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them. Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. Utterly amazed, they asked: "Are not all these men who are speaking Galileans? Then how is it that each of us hears them in his own native language? Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome (both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs--we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!" Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, "What does this mean?" AC 2:1-12 NIV

And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God. And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, saying one to another, What meaneth this? AC 2:1-12 KJV

Reading these Scriptures in their proper context, we see that the apostles spoke, and the people heard foreign languages, languages that were known by those that were present. And we also see the reason that the Holy Spirit gave them this gift; "…we hear them declaring the wonders of God…".  Without the ability to speak in foreign languages, foreigners would not have heard the message and so become saved. But what we often hear in churches today is not foreign languages, but something totally different. Practitioners of speaking in tongues in public settings such as church don’t understand what it is they are doing. While they think they are praying to God (and they may very well be), others around them that are unfamiliar with the practice think they are crazy (1 Corinthians 14:23). If there is a reason for a person to speak in tongues (a foreign language) in a public place, the Holy Spirit will enable someone to speak, but He will also enable someone to interpret what was spoken so that everyone can understand.

The Bible tells us why someone might speak in tongues before a group.

Compare the NIV to the KJV

"…a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue [a foreign language for the sake of a foreigner] or an interpretation.  All of these must be done for the strengthening of the church." 1 Corinthians 14:26 NIV.

“… when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue [a foreign language for the sake of a foreigner], hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying”. 1 Corinthians 14:26 KJV

The Bible is also clear that if there is no one to interpret, then the speaker must remain silent.

If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God. 1 Corinthians 14:28 NIV

But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God. 1 Corinthians 14:28 KJV

I have been in many church services where so-called speaking in tongues occurred. Even in the pulpit, speaking in tongues was often practiced. But not once did I ever hear a single interpretation. If speaking in tongues, was permitted by the Holy Spirit, there would have been a reason for allowing it, there would have been an interpretation of the message, and it would have been done in an orderly way. Only two, or three people at the most would have been given the gift since the Holy Spirit is a Spirit of order (1 Corinthians 14:27,40).

If anyone speaks in a tongue, two–or at the most three–should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. 1 Corinthians 14:27 NIV

But everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way. 1 Corinthians 14:40 NIV

If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. 1 Corinthians 14:27 KJV

Let all things be done decently and in order. 1 Corinthians 14:40 KJV

There are two Greek words for tongue :

glossa {gloce-sah'} (Strong's 1100)
1) the tongue, a member of the body, an organ of speech
2) a tongue
a) the language or dialect used by a particular people distinct from that of other nations

And also:

dialektos {dee-al'-ek-tos} (Strong's 1258)
1) conversation, speech, discourse, language
2) the tongue or language peculiar to any people

The Greek word for tongue, dialektos as it is used in Acts 2:6 and Acts 2:8 is also interchangeable with the word, language.

The Greek word for tongue, glossa as it is used in 1 Corinthians 14:40 is the same word that is used in Acts 2:4, 11.

Each of these words literally translated, in no way infers that speaking in tongues is anything other than speaking in known foreign languages, and the only Scriptures that lend the remotest possibility of speaking a language that is only known to God and angels, is 1 Corinthians 13:1, 14:1-2, and 14:27-28, which will be discussed later.

There might be confusion between Scriptures of different Bible translations.  One problem I found in comparing translations was with the word unknown.  There are several references to speaking in tongues where the word unknown is missing from the NIV, but is present in the KJV.  This confusion can be cleared up when you realize that the King James translators italicized certain words to indicate that their usage was their "addition" to the text reading and translation.  Italicized words in the King James Version are words that do not exist in the original text. Therefore, the context that these words are used in means everything (See http://www.biblebelievers.com/jmelton/italics.html for further explanation).

For example:

If anyone speaks in a tongue, two–or at the most three–should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. 1 Corinthians 14:27 NIV

If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. 1 Corinthians 14:27 KJV

Note: The online KJV at Biblegateway.com does not show the word unknown in italics, but all written versions do.

Here we see that the King James translators added the word, unknown to the text, leading some people to believe that this was a tongue or language that is only known to God and angels.  It would be a mistake to make this assumption since the Greek word for tongue (glossa or dialektos) literally translates into the language or dialect used by a particular people distinct from that of other nations, or the tongue or language peculiar to any people. Carefully reading the account of what took place at Pentecost, one can easily see that foreign languages that may have been unknown to each other were spoken, and all of those languages were understood by those that were familiar with them.

But confusion persists as people practice what they believe is speaking in tongues. And they do not practice their so-called gift according to the Scriptures. Hundreds of people in one church service would not be moved by the Holy Spirit to speak in tongues if the Scriptures say that only two or three at the most should do it, and then there must be an interpretation.

Speaking in tongues may be evidence that a person has received the gift of the Holy Spirit because the Holy Spirit does bestow that gift upon those whom He decides to bestow it (Hebrews. 2:4, 1 Corinthians 12:7-11). But speaking in tongues may also be evidence of someone who is deceived, and is speaking a language that originates from Satan. There are many examples of religious babbling other than in the Christian faith that are clearly satanic in origin. Well meaning Christians therefore, must be absolutely sure that indeed, the Holy Spirit has given them that gift so that they do not fall into the trap of cursing God in tongues, when they really mean to give Him praise. Consider the following:

Felicitas D. Goodman, a psychological anthropologist and linguist, engaged in a study of various English - Spanish - and Mayan-speaking Pentecostal communities in the United States and Mexico. She compared tape recordings of non-Christian rituals from Africa, Borneo, Indonesia and Japan as well. She published her results in 1972 in an extensive monograph (Speaking in Tongues: A Cross-Cultural Study in Glossolalia by Felecitas D. Goodman, University of Chicago Press, 1972).

Goodman concludes that "when all features of glossolalia [speaking in tongues] were taken into consideration--that is, the segmental structure (such as sounds, syllables, phrases) and its suprasegmental elements (namely, rhythm, accent, and especially overall intonation)-- she concluded that there is no distinction in glossolalia between Christians and the followers of non-Christian (pagan) religions. The "association between trance and glossolalia is now accepted by many researchers as a correct assumption," writes Goodman in the prestigious Encyclopedia of Religion (1987).

Goodman also concludes that glossolalia "is, actually, a learned behavior, learned either unawarely or, sometimes consciously." Others have previously pointed out that direct instruction is given on how to "speak in tongues," ie. how to engage in glossolalia.

In fact, it has been found that the "speaking in tongues" practiced in Christian churches and by individual Christians is identical to the chanting language of those who practice voodoo on the darkest continents of this world.

Those who speak in tongues are also becoming involved in "holy laughter" - laughing uncontrollably, falling down on the ground, rolling around, having seizure-like activity, being struck dumb, or being "slain in the spirit."
http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/speakingtongues.htm

I have found no evidence in the Bible to support the claim that the Holy Spirit does not today give the gift of speaking in tongues. On the contrary, the apostle Paul alludes to the fact that this gift still exists today, and that we should not forbid the practice. However, it must be done, "…in a fitting and orderly way."

Therefore, my brothers, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues. But everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way. 1COR 14:39-40

The practice of speaking in tongues in many churches today is far from fitting and orderly. First, fitting would suggest that there is a reason and a purpose for such an activity, mainly, to bring instructions to the people, from God "…a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation”, including people who are foreigners that cannot understand unless you speak in their language (or maybe you’re the foreigner such as a missionary in a foreign country). And second, orderly suggests, and the Bible makes this point clear, that no more than three people should speak in this manner, and there must be an interpreter so that although the foreigner might understand the speaker, the rest of the congregation must also be made aware of what is being said. Speaking in tongues in this context, means speaking in a known foreign language, just as on the day of Pentecost.  On the day of Pentecost, there is no reference to speaking in a language that is only known to God and angels. 

The Bible says that when you speak in tongues, you edify yourself, not the church (1 Corinthians 14:4-5). The apostle Paul would rather you edify the church. Edifying the church is only possible when someone speaks in tongues, and only when there is someone who can rightly interpret what is spoken (1 Corinthians 14:12). As we saw earlier, edifying the church involves "…a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. All of these must be done for the strengthening of the church." 1 Corinthians 14:26.

There are some Scriptures that suggest to me that there is perhaps a language that can be spoken that only God and angels can understand. I don’t have a problem with this possibility, but I do have a problem with the liberties that have been taken with it. Speaking in tongues (known foreign languages) in a group setting such as in church is for the purpose of bringing instructions to the people that are listening. If there is another tongue (language) that only God and angels can understand, then speaking this language should only be done in private.

If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 1 Corinthians 13:1

Take into consideration that the apostle Paul begins with the word, “If “, in 1 Corinthians 13:1.  He does not say that he can speak in the tongues of angels, but only if he did speak in the tongues of angels...

Follow the way of love and eagerly desire spiritual gifts, especially the gift of prophecy. For anyone who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. Indeed, no one understands him; he utters mysteries with his spirit. 1 Corinthians 14:1-2

If anyone speaks in a tongue, two--or at the most three--should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God. 1 Corinthians 14:27-28

1 Corinthians 14:1-2, and 27-28 gives me reason to believe that speaking in tongues (a language that only God and angels can understand) might be possible, even today.  If it is true that speaking a language that only God and angels can understand is possible, it has nothing to do with instructions for the church or even edifying the church.  If this is a legitimate form of communicating to God, it must be done in private so that unbelievers don’t think you’re crazy, and because 1 Corinthians 14:1-2 says that no one but God will understand you.  In this case, an interpretation is not even possible since only God understands you. If an interpretation is not possible, the speaker must remain silent.

The apostle Paul was firm about people speaking intelligible words so that everyone would understand what was being said.  When referring to what a person sounds like while speaking in tongues, The NIV uses the word foreigner in 1 Corinthians 14:11, but the KJV uses the more accurate word, barbarian.

If then I do not grasp the meaning of what someone is saying, I am a foreigner to the speaker, and he is a foreigner to me. 1 Corinthians 14:11 NIV

Therefore if I know not the meaning of the voice, I shall be unto him that speaketh a barbarian, and he that speaketh shall be a barbarian unto me. 1 Corinthians 14:11 KJV

The Greek word for barbarian is:

{bar'-bar-os} Strong's 915
1) one whose speech is rude, rough and harsh
2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not understood by another
3) used by the Greeks of any foreigner ignorant of the Greek language, whether mental or moral, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness and brutality. The word is used in the N.T. without the idea of reproachfulness.

In this context, the apostle Paul is telling us that speaking in a foreign language that is not understood by anyone makes a person sound like a barbarian.  Speaking in a tongue (foreign language) has a purpose, and that purpose is to edify the Church by giving "…a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation”. Speaking in tongues was also given as a sign for unbelievers. 

Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying [serveth] not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.  1 Corinthians 14:22

The sign that the apostle Paul is speaking about is not unintelligible babbling, but that the unbeliever can hear and understand what is being said in his own language, which is being spoken by a foreigner.  This was the sign at Pentecost.  Unbelievers became believers because of the miracle that took place.  Uneducated Galileans were speaking to them in languages that they could understand.

If therefore the whole church be come together into one place, and all speak with tongues, and there come in [those that are] unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that ye are mad? 1 Corinthians 14:23

Unbelievers that hear what they consider unintelligible babbling, will think the Church has lost its mind.  The apostle Paul wants to make sure that we don’t scare off unbelievers. This is why he would rather that we all prophesy. He wanted unbelievers to become believers by hearing the message.  If they hear babble, where is the message?

But if all prophesy, and there come in one that believeth not, or [one] unlearned, he is convinced of all, he is judged of all: And thus are the secrets of his heart made manifest; and so falling down on [his] face he will worship God, and report that God is in you of a truth. 1 Corinthians 14:24-25

In other words, if the unbeliever hears the true message, he becomes convinced and repents, falling down on his face to worship God, and that the God that resides in you is the true God.  This is not possible when tongues (a language that only God and angels can understand) is spoken around unbelievers. And since only God and angels can understand this language (and no interpretation is possible), speaking in tongues (a language that only God and angels can understand) must be done in silence.

On the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-4) the people heard the message in their own tongue [language], because God wanted them to hear the Gospel (Acts 2:5-36). The apostles spoke in tongues [other languages] to the people that were present, and not to God, and the people heard the message in their own language. Acts 2:37-39 explains why it was important to speak in foreign languages.

When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, "Brothers, what shall we do?" Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off--for all whom the Lord our God will call." AC 2:37-39

On the day of Pentecost, After hearing the message in their own language, recognizing the miracle that had come from God, they were cut to the heart and wanted to know what they must do.  So the apostles instructed them on how to be saved.

The people heard the message, they believed it, and those who repented and were baptized, received the gift of the Holy Spirit. These instructions were not only for them, but they were for all whom God will call in the future. If there is a language barrier in leading the world to Christ, God will make a way for that barrier to be broken. He sent His people out to preach the Gospel to the world; to make disciples, and to baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. He gave the command, therefore He will equip those that He sends, with the means to communicate His message, even if that means allowing the messenger the ability to speak in a foreign language, just like He did at Pentecost.

And he [Jesus] said unto them, “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues…” Mark 16:15-17

Why do you suppose God would give some believers the gift to speak with new tongues?  So that they too might carry on His mission to go out into all the world, and preach the gospel.

There is one final point to consider.

The contemporary phenomenon of "speaking in tongues" is of recent origin in Christianity. It is part of the Pentecostalism of the twentieth century, beginning in modern times around 1900 and more recently, since the 1960's, involving the charismatic movement.
http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/speakingtongues.htm

Why had the gift of tongues not been made manifest until around 1900?  Were there no true Christians in the world, preventing the Holy Spirit from giving the gift of tongues? And if there were no true Christians in the world, how could others hear and then believe so that they too might receive the gift of the Holy Spirit?  Did non-Christians preach the gospel according to the command that Jesus gave His disciples, to go out into all the world and preach the gospel?  Certainly, non-Christians do make an attempt to preach the gospel, but it is only for personal gain that they do.  Not having the proper understanding, their gospel is that different gospel that the Bible warns us about.

How did the Holy Spirit work on the day of Pentecost?

And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. Acts 2:4 KJV

The word "gave" denotes a gift of the Holy Spirit. The gift of speaking in tongues is not a learned experience. This is in contrast to the practice in Pentecostalism and among the charismatics with their meetings of groups of people where they are taught how to expand their consciousness and bypass the intellect in order to engage in glossolalia, speaking in tongues.
http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/speakingtongues.htm

I was once part of a large Pentecostal/Charismatic church.  During one of our Sunday evening services, the senior pastor decided to devote the time to the laying on hands for the purpose of administering the baptism of the Holy Spirit for certain members. Such a large church required that there would be many pastors assigned to a certain number of individuals.  They were called, Shepherding pastors.  After the senior pastor made the announcement, my shepherding pastor came directly to where I was standing.  “Bruce”, he said, “would you like to receive the Holy Spirit?”  I told him “I already have the Holy Spirit.” He told me that if I really wanted to receive the Holy Spirit, he would lay his hands on me and pray, and I would then be able to speak in tongues. Then he explained to me how to go about speaking in tongues.

“Open your mouth” he said, “Stick out your tongue and wiggle it while you try to make a sound. Don’t worry if it sounds strange, it’s supposed to sound strange.”  I told him that I would not do as he instructed because “If God wants me to speak in tongues, He will cause me to do it without having to be taught”. He then prayed that the spirit of stubbornness would leave me so that one day I could receive the Holy Spirit, and then he went on to someone else. 

This was most insulting to me.  I had been a Christian for about three years when that event took place.  Had my faith been weak, I might have surrendered to the pressure to speak the babble that the pastor was trying to make me speak, or I would have left feeling like I would never be a Christian since I was unable to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit (according to my pastor). 

Conclusion

I am not convinced that there is a language that only God and angels can understand or even that men can be given the ability to speak it.  But I have to say that based on certain Scriptures I can’t count out that possibility.  If the possibility exists, it is for speaking directly to God and must be done in private since no interpretation is possible (1 Corinthians 14:1-2). 

I am convinced that God gave the apostles the gift to speak in known foreign languages, as demonstrated on the day of Pentecost.  I can’t rule out the possibility that God gives that gift (to speak in known foreign languages) to people today.  There is nothing in the Bible that tells me that God has ceased to give that gift.  He can do what He wants to do, when He wants to do it as long as it does not go against His Word or His nature.  

Contact me about this article

Blog Me - Feel passionate about this subject? Join my blog and lets talk about it. You'll have to register but it's quick and easy.

Permission is granted to copy and distribute this article in its entirety, provided that it is not sold or used in any publication that is sold.  Also, this disclaimer must accompany the article along with the author’s copyright and Zondervan’s copyright. All other uses for this article must be approved by the author in writing.

 

Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture on this website was taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION(r). Copyright (c) 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Elated PageKits